⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 8 points worse than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Ran them off the floor, 26 fast break points to 11
A 13-0 run took them from 6 down to 7 up in the second quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 1 down to 9 up
Q1 7:36 · MEM 20-11 SAC
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run cut a 11-point deficit to 2
Q3 7:47 · MEM 68-70 SAC
- Winner
Tim Frazier hit a 3-foot two point shot
Q4 2:31 · MEM 100-99 SAC
Bad plays
- Turnover
Justise Winslow bad pass
Q4 2:49 · MEM 98-97 SAC
- Missed FT
Justise Winslow misses free throw 1 of 2
Q4 0:05 · MEM 107-106 SAC
- Missed FT
Justise Winslow misses free throw 2 of 2
Q4 0:05 · MEM 107-106 SAC
Kings
Good plays
- 13-0 run
A 13-0 run took them from 6 down to 7 up
Q2 7:58 · MEM 42-49 SAC
- Steal
Louis King stole it from Justise Winslow
Q4 2:49 · MEM 98-97 SAC
- Go-ahead
Justin James hit a two point shot, Louis King with the assist
Q4 2:44 · MEM 98-99 SAC
Bad plays
- Technical
Chimezie Metu technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q1 0:46 · MEM 28-23 SAC
- Turnover
Justin James lost ball turnover
Q4 0:21 · MEM 106-101 SAC
📊The numbers
| MEM | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Shooting from the field | 39% |
| 11 | Threes made | 10 |
| 33% | Three-point accuracy | 24% |
| 22 | Free throws made | 22 |
| 49 | Rebounds | 56 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 14 |
| 23 | Assists | 21 |
| 52 | Points in the paint | 52 |
| 26 | Fast break points | 11 |
| 20 | Points off turnovers | 14 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 8 | Steals | 7 |
| 5 | Blocks | 2 |
