⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Wizards got 15 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ WSH better than we expected
▼ IND better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 16 points better than our numbers for the Wizards.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Wizards won, and why the Pacers did not.
From the game
A 16-0 run from level to 16 points up in the second quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Wizards
Good plays
- 16-0 run
A 16-0 run from level to 16 points up
Q2 10:12 · WSH 50-34 IND
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 19-point lead to 27
Q3 6:10 · WSH 93-66 IND
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 27-point lead to 37
Q4 9:26 · WSH 126-89 IND
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Pacers
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 34-point deficit to 26
Q4 2:25 · WSH 139-113 IND
Bad plays
- Technical
Goga Bitadze technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 0:45 · WSH 112-83 IND
📊The numbers
| WSH | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| 0% | Shooting from the field | 0% |
| 0 | Threes made | 0 |
| 0% | Three-point accuracy | 0% |
| 0 | Free throws made | 0 |
| 0 | Rebounds | 0 |
| 0 | Offensive rebounds | 0 |
| 0 | Assists | 0 |
| 0 | Points in the paint | 0 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 0 | Points off turnovers | 0 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 0 | Steals | 0 |
| 0 | Blocks | 0 |
