โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 14 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
โฒ MIL better than we expected
โผ GS better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 20 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Warriors did not.
From the game
Ran them off the floor, 19 fast break points to 4
Gave up second chances, twelve offensive rebounds to their five
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Bucks
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 4-point lead to 14
Q1 8:23 ยท MIL 18-4 GS
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 13-point lead to 24
Q2 11:33 ยท MIL 48-24 GS
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 18-point lead to 27
Q4 9:20 ยท MIL 109-82 GS
Bad plays
- Technical
Khris Middleton technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 9:15 ยท MIL 82-44 GS

Warriors
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 37-point deficit to 29
Q3 6:32 ยท MIL 88-59 GS
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run cut a 28-point deficit to 18
Q4 11:18 ยท MIL 100-82 GS
Bad plays
- Technical
Steve Kerr technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q1 7:22 ยท MIL 13-4 GS
๐The numbers
| MIL | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 35% |
| 18 | Threes made | 16 |
| 44% | Three-point accuracy | 33% |
| 12 | Free throws made | 17 |
| 54 | Rebounds | 49 |
| 5 | Offensive rebounds | 12 |
| 29 | Assists | 20 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 28 |
| 19 | Fast break points | 4 |
| 14 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 10 | Steals | 9 |
| 7 | Blocks | 2 |








