⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz fell 8 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 8 points worse than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Lived at the line, 31 free throws to their 21- Won the glass, 44 rebounds to 33
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Jazz
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 8 down to 1 up
Q2 11:21 · UTAH 46-45 SAC
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run took them from 5 down to 6 up
Q2 2:27 · UTAH 71-65 SAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 1 down to 7 up
Q2 8:35 · UTAH 46-53 SAC
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run cut a 16-point deficit to 5
Q4 9:15 · UTAH 111-106 SAC
Bad plays
- Technical
Richaun Holmes technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q4 12:00 · UTAH 100-88 SAC
📊The numbers
| UTAH | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 56% | Shooting from the field | 50% |
| 16 | Threes made | 13 |
| 39% | Three-point accuracy | 39% |
| 22 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 44 | Rebounds | 33 |
| 10 | Offensive rebounds | 8 |
| 21 | Assists | 27 |
| 54 | Points in the paint | 50 |
| 15 | Fast break points | 10 |
| 14 | Points off turnovers | 11 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 4 | Steals | 6 |
| 5 | Blocks | 3 |
