⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 22 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ IND better than we expected
▼ MEM better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 16 points worse than our numbers for the Pacers.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Pacers did not.
From the game
Made fifteen threes to their six- Looked after the ball, ten turnovers to their nineteen, and were outscored 32-3 off them
- Owned the paint, 72 points inside to 54
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Pacers
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Isaiah Jackson flagrant foul type 1
Q4 10:05 · IND 72-111 MEM
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 19-point lead to 27
Q2 2:04 · IND 45-72 MEM
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 23-point lead to 33
Q3 11:27 · IND 51-84 MEM
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 35-point lead to 43
Q4 10:45 · IND 72-115 MEM
Bad plays
- Technical
Dillon Brooks technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q1 7:48 · IND 10-13 MEM
📊The numbers
| IND | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Shooting from the field | 51% |
| 6 | Threes made | 15 |
| 20% | Three-point accuracy | 38% |
| 14 | Free throws made | 12 |
| 49 | Rebounds | 51 |
| 16 | Offensive rebounds | 18 |
| 23 | Assists | 38 |
| 54 | Points in the paint | 72 |
| 9 | Fast break points | 33 |
| 32 | Points off turnovers | 3 |
| 19 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 4 | Steals | 11 |
| 3 | Blocks | 11 |
