⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Clippers got 9 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ LAC better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 14 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Clippers won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Made 23 threes to their eight- A 12-0 run stretched a 31-point lead to 43 in the fourth quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Bobby Portis technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 1:12 · MIL 60-67 LAC
- Technical
Mike Budenholzer technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 7:16 · MIL 73-92 LAC
Clippers
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 3 down to 6 up
Q2 6:16 · MIL 54-60 LAC
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run stretched a 31-point lead to 43
Q4 5:49 · MIL 104-147 LAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MIL | LAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 53% | Shooting from the field | 61% |
| 8 | Threes made | 23 |
| 32% | Three-point accuracy | 53% |
| 11 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 38 | Rebounds | 36 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 8 |
| 30 | Assists | 34 |
| 68 | Points in the paint | 58 |
| 12 | Fast break points | 23 |
| 23 | Points off turnovers | 12 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 6 | Steals | 9 |
| 5 | Blocks | 7 |
