⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 10 points ahead of the pace we expected in the fourth quarter.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 11 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Won the glass, 50 rebounds to 40
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 6 down to 2 up
Q1 8:00 · MIL 18-16 SAC
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 4-point lead to 12
Q4 6:03 · MIL 117-105 SAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run from level to 8 points up
Q1 11:39 · MIL 0-8 SAC
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 12-point deficit to 4
Q3 7:48 · MIL 80-76 SAC
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 11-point deficit to 3
Q3 2:25 · MIL 95-92 SAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MIL | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Shooting from the field | 47% |
| 14 | Threes made | 12 |
| 42% | Three-point accuracy | 32% |
| 20 | Free throws made | 15 |
| 50 | Rebounds | 40 |
| 17 | Offensive rebounds | 8 |
| 34 | Assists | 19 |
| 56 | Points in the paint | 48 |
| 11 | Fast break points | 7 |
| 4 | Points off turnovers | 8 |
| 7 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 3 | Steals | 2 |
| 2 | Blocks | 4 |
