⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bulls got 18 points ahead of the pace we expected in the fourth quarter. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ CHI better than we expected
▼ WSH better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 14 points better than our numbers for the Bulls.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bulls won, and why the Wizards did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bulls
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run took them from 6 down to 5 up
Q1 1:16 · CHI 32-27 WSH
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 3 down to 6 up
Q3 9:08 · CHI 58-52 WSH
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 21
Q4 4:13 · CHI 99-78 WSH
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Wizards
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Bradley Beal technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 5:18 · CHI 61-56 WSH
- Technical
Daniel Gafford technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q4 4:13 · CHI 88-78 WSH
📊The numbers
| CHI | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 42% |
| 8 | Threes made | 6 |
| 27% | Three-point accuracy | 21% |
| 14 | Free throws made | 12 |
| 39 | Rebounds | 42 |
| 8 | Offensive rebounds | 12 |
| 21 | Assists | 22 |
| 38 | Points in the paint | 44 |
| 9 | Fast break points | 10 |
| 15 | Points off turnovers | 25 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 7 | Steals | 5 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
