⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 11 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ WSH better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 9 points worse than our numbers for the Wizards.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Wizards did not.
From the game
Made 23 threes to their thirteen- Won the glass, 56 rebounds to 42
- Kept giving it away, eighteen turnovers to their nine
- Beaten inside, 50 points in the paint to 74
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Wizards
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Kendrick Nunn technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 10:01 · WSH 36-41 MIL
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run from level to 8 points up
Q1 1:36 · WSH 24-32 MIL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 12
Q2 6:52 · WSH 47-59 MIL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| WSH | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 54% |
| 13 | Threes made | 23 |
| 48% | Three-point accuracy | 55% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 17 |
| 42 | Rebounds | 56 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 12 |
| 30 | Assists | 33 |
| 74 | Points in the paint | 50 |
| 16 | Fast break points | 9 |
| 15 | Points off turnovers | 22 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 18 |
| 7 | Steals | 6 |
| 4 | Blocks | 7 |
