⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Hawks got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ ATL better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 18 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Hawks won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, seventeen turnovers to their 23- Ran them off the floor, 25 fast break points to 7
- A 12-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 15 in the second quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Bobby Portis technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 7:44 · MIL 33-38 ATL
Hawks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 7-point lead to 15
Q1 4:21 · MIL 11-26 ATL
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 15
Q2 8:06 · MIL 33-48 ATL
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 20-point lead to 31
Q4 9:15 · MIL 87-118 ATL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MIL | ATL | |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Shooting from the field | 51% |
| 16 | Threes made | 15 |
| 36% | Three-point accuracy | 41% |
| 16 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 39 | Rebounds | 46 |
| 12 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 22 | Assists | 32 |
| 44 | Points in the paint | 50 |
| 7 | Fast break points | 25 |
| 22 | Points off turnovers | 22 |
| 23 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 10 | Steals | 15 |
| 3 | Blocks | 2 |
