⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ TOR better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 16 points worse than our numbers for the Raptors.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Raptors did not.
From the game
Made twenty threes to their nine- Shot well above their usual, twenty of 39 from three
- A 17-0 run took them from 6 down to 11 up in the first quarter
- Could not get to the line, 21 free throws to their 31
- Beaten inside, 34 points in the paint to 52
A 12-0 run cut a 32-point deficit to 20 in the third quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Raptors
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 2 down to 6 up
Q1 10:52 · TOR 8-2 MIL
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run cut a 32-point deficit to 20
Q3 3:04 · TOR 78-98 MIL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run cut a 25-point deficit to 16
Q4 2:22 · TOR 112-128 MIL
Bad plays
- Technical
Darko Rajakovic technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 6:55 · TOR 58-85 MIL
Bucks
Good plays
- 17-0 run
A 17-0 run took them from 6 down to 11 up
Q1 9:40 · TOR 8-19 MIL
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 20-point lead to 30
Q2 0:00 · TOR 47-77 MIL
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 17-point lead to 25
Q4 4:00 · TOR 103-128 MIL
Bad plays
- Technical
Thanasis Antetokounmpo flopping technical foul
Q1 0:00 · TOR 20-36 MIL
📊The numbers
| TOR | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Shooting from the field | 52% |
| 9 | Threes made | 20 |
| 27% | Three-point accuracy | 51% |
| 27 | Free throws made | 20 |
| 55 | Rebounds | 41 |
| 26 | Offensive rebounds | 9 |
| 28 | Assists | 25 |
| 52 | Points in the paint | 34 |
| 16 | Fast break points | 9 |
| 20 | Points off turnovers | 16 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 10 | Steals | 8 |
| 8 | Blocks | 9 |
