⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 13 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ CHA better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 13 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Hornets did not.
From the game
Won the glass, 51 rebounds to 37- Owned the paint, 50 points inside to 32
- A 18-0 run stretched a 14-point lead to 32 in the second quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 15-0 run
A 15-0 run took them from 2 down to 13 up
Q1 6:06 · MIL 24-11 CHA
- 18-0 run
A 18-0 run stretched a 14-point lead to 32
Q2 7:53 · MIL 56-24 CHA
- 13-0 run
A 13-0 run stretched a 32-point lead to 45
Q3 6:53 · MIL 84-39 CHA
Bad plays
- Technical
Thanasis Antetokounmpo technical foul
Q4 2:46 · MIL 118-75 CHA
Hornets
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Grant Williams technical foul
Q4 9:20 · MIL 103-58 CHA
- Missed FT
Tre Mann misses technical free throw
Q4 2:46 · MIL 118-75 CHA
📊The numbers
| MIL | CHA | |
|---|---|---|
| 52% | Shooting from the field | 37% |
| 16 | Threes made | 11 |
| 40% | Three-point accuracy | 28% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 14 |
| 51 | Rebounds | 37 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 5 |
| 29 | Assists | 24 |
| 50 | Points in the paint | 32 |
| 17 | Fast break points | 11 |
| 11 | Points off turnovers | 23 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 7 | Steals | 6 |
| 3 | Blocks | 2 |
