⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ DET better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 9 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Pistons did not.
From the game
Won the glass, 49 rebounds to 38
Owned the paint, 60 points inside to 38
A 13-0 run took them from 3 down to 10 up in the first quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Grizzlies
Good plays
- 13-0 run
A 13-0 run took them from 3 down to 10 up
Q1 2:21 · MEM 32-22 DET
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 14
Q2 8:23 · MEM 45-31 DET
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 12-point lead to 20
Q2 5:37 · MEM 53-33 DET
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Pistons
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run cut a 25-point deficit to 16
Q4 3:44 · MEM 106-90 DET
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MEM | DET | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 41% |
| 10 | Threes made | 8 |
| 32% | Three-point accuracy | 27% |
| 14 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 49 | Rebounds | 38 |
| 15 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 24 | Assists | 22 |
| 60 | Points in the paint | 38 |
| 14 | Fast break points | 14 |
| 20 | Points off turnovers | 17 |
| 21 | Turnovers | 18 |
| 13 | Steals | 13 |
| 7 | Blocks | 4 |







