⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the third quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ WSH better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 10 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Wizards did not.
From the game
A 12-0 run stretched a 11-point lead to 23 in the second quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 4-point lead to 12
Q1 5:11 · MEM 26-14 WSH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 18
Q1 3:20 · MEM 34-16 WSH
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run stretched a 11-point lead to 23
Q2 3:23 · MEM 64-41 WSH
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Jaren Jackson Jr. flagrant foul type 1
Q4 9:18 · MEM 103-75 WSH
Wizards
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 18-point deficit to 10
Q1 2:12 · MEM 34-24 WSH
Bad plays
- Technical
Double technical foul - Jonas Valanciunas and Zach Edey
Q3 3:50 · MEM 85-61 WSH
- Missed FT
Carlton Carrington misses free throw flagrant 1 of 2
Q4 9:18 · MEM 103-75 WSH
📊The numbers
| MEM | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 41% |
| 14 | Threes made | 9 |
| 33% | Three-point accuracy | 26% |
| 22 | Free throws made | 19 |
| 50 | Rebounds | 41 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 30 | Assists | 27 |
| 60 | Points in the paint | 54 |
| 15 | Fast break points | 14 |
| 22 | Points off turnovers | 22 |
| 19 | Turnovers | 18 |
| 10 | Steals | 14 |
| 10 | Blocks | 8 |
