⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ CHI better than we expected
▼ MEM better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 8 points worse than our numbers for the Bulls.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Bulls did not.
From the game
Won the glass, 49 rebounds to 35
Ran them off the floor, 28 fast break points to 10
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Bulls
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run cut a 15-point deficit to 4
Q2 3:11 · CHI 58-62 MEM
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run cut a 22-point deficit to 11
Q4 4:51 · CHI 125-136 MEM
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Grizzlies
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 13
Q3 5:26 · CHI 84-97 MEM
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| CHI | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 57% |
| 19 | Threes made | 19 |
| 45% | Three-point accuracy | 45% |
| 14 | Free throws made | 13 |
| 35 | Rebounds | 49 |
| 10 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 29 | Assists | 38 |
| 58 | Points in the paint | 64 |
| 10 | Fast break points | 28 |
| 16 | Points off turnovers | 14 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 4 | Steals | 5 |
| 8 | Blocks | 4 |








