⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Pacers stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ IND better than we expected
▼ GS better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 5 points better than our numbers for the Pacers.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Pacers won, and why the Warriors did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Pacers
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 3 down to 5 up
Q1 3:45 · IND 25-20 GS
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 1 down to 9 up
Q2 8:17 · IND 39-30 GS
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 13
Q4 8:37 · IND 94-81 GS
Bad plays
- Technical
Double technical foul - Andrew Nembhard and Dennis Schroder
Q1 8:03 · IND 8-3 GS
- Technical
Rick Carlisle technical foul
Q2 2:16 · IND 46-36 GS
Warriors
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| IND | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| 52% | Shooting from the field | 42% |
| 9 | Threes made | 10 |
| 33% | Three-point accuracy | 26% |
| 13 | Free throws made | 10 |
| 48 | Rebounds | 42 |
| 8 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 27 | Assists | 25 |
| 54 | Points in the paint | 46 |
| 23 | Fast break points | 17 |
| 20 | Points off turnovers | 21 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 8 | Steals | 11 |
| 8 | Blocks | 2 |
