⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
▼ WSH better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 7 points better than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Wizards did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run from level to 8 points up
Q1 4:18 · SAC 23-15 WSH
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 2-point lead to 11
Q2 9:06 · SAC 43-32 WSH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 11-point lead to 19
Q4 7:09 · SAC 110-91 WSH
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Wizards
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| SAC | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Shooting from the field | 36% |
| 12 | Threes made | 10 |
| 31% | Three-point accuracy | 24% |
| 19 | Free throws made | 26 |
| 51 | Rebounds | 46 |
| 10 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 28 | Assists | 19 |
| 52 | Points in the paint | 40 |
| 17 | Fast break points | 13 |
| 16 | Points off turnovers | 18 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 12 | Steals | 6 |
| 4 | Blocks | 1 |
