⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Hawks got 11 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ ATL better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 21 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Hawks won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Won the glass, 46 rebounds to 36
Owned the paint, 62 points inside to 46
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Hawks
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run took them from 4 down to 7 up
Q2 6:28 · MIL 65-72 ATL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 15
Q3 11:23 · MIL 76-91 ATL
Bad plays
- Technical
Trae Young technical foul
Q3 12:00 · MIL 75-82 ATL
- Technical
Terance Mann technical foul
Q3 6:05 · MIL 81-101 ATL
- Technical
Double technical foul - Terance Mann and Andre Jackson Jr.
Q4 9:14 · MIL 104-124 ATL
📊The numbers
| MIL | ATL | |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Shooting from the field | 53% |
| 12 | Threes made | 17 |
| 34% | Three-point accuracy | 35% |
| 34 | Free throws made | 28 |
| 36 | Rebounds | 46 |
| 6 | Offensive rebounds | 15 |
| 21 | Assists | 36 |
| 46 | Points in the paint | 62 |
| 4 | Fast break points | 22 |
| 28 | Points off turnovers | 11 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 5 | Steals | 10 |
| 2 | Blocks | 2 |









