⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks fell 12 points behind the pace we expected in the second quarter but finished ahead of it.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ IND better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 20 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Pacers did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 20
Q4 7:11 · MIL 105-85 IND
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Pacers
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 1 down to 9 up
Q2 4:43 · MIL 39-48 IND
Bad plays
- Technical
Bennedict Mathurin technical foul
Q3 4:45 · MIL 73-69 IND
📊The numbers
| MIL | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 43% |
| 15 | Threes made | 13 |
| 37% | Three-point accuracy | 32% |
| 18 | Free throws made | 10 |
| 48 | Rebounds | 40 |
| 10 | Offensive rebounds | 7 |
| 28 | Assists | 32 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 34 |
| 14 | Fast break points | 15 |
| 13 | Points off turnovers | 22 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 8 | Steals | 8 |
| 4 | Blocks | 4 |
