⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz got 10 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 11 points better than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Jazz
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 6 down to 2 up
Q1 6:51 · UTAH 18-16 SAC
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 12
Q2 11:08 · UTAH 39-27 SAC
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 7-point lead to 17
Q3 2:44 · UTAH 90-73 SAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Kings
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Nique Clifford flagrant foul type 1
Q3 1:35 · UTAH 83-73 SAC
📊The numbers
| UTAH | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Shooting from the field | 45% |
| 13 | Threes made | 10 |
| 33% | Three-point accuracy | 34% |
| 31 | Free throws made | 23 |
| 49 | Rebounds | 44 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 12 |
| 32 | Assists | 27 |
| 50 | Points in the paint | 48 |
| 8 | Fast break points | 19 |
| 19 | Points off turnovers | 8 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 7 | Steals | 9 |
| 5 | Blocks | 5 |
