⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks fell 10 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter but finished ahead of it.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ DET better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 11 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Pistons did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run cut a 18-point deficit to 7
Q1 1:30 · MIL 23-30 DET
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 4 down to 4 up
Q4 7:14 · MIL 99-95 DET
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 5 down to 5 up
Q4 1:55 · MIL 113-108 DET
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Jericho Sims flagrant foul type 1
Q2 6:45 · MIL 31-42 DET
- Turnover
Shot clock turnover
Q4 0:57 · MIL 109-108 DET
Pistons
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 15
Q1 8:45 · MIL 4-19 DET
- Lead
Cade Cunningham hit a two point shot
Q4 2:53 · MIL 103-105 DET
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 3 down to 5 up
Q4 4:13 · MIL 103-108 DET
Bad plays
- Turnover
Caris LeVert bad pass
Q4 1:44 · MIL 106-108 DET
- Turnover
Cade Cunningham back court turnover
Q4 1:21 · MIL 109-108 DET
- Missed FT
Caris LeVert misses free throw 2 of 2
Q4 0:01 · MIL 113-109 DET
📊The numbers
| MIL | DET | |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Shooting from the field | 40% |
| 13 | Threes made | 14 |
| 30% | Three-point accuracy | 33% |
| 20 | Free throws made | 19 |
| 40 | Rebounds | 44 |
| 8 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 28 | Assists | 25 |
| 46 | Points in the paint | 40 |
| 16 | Fast break points | 8 |
| 12 | Points off turnovers | 22 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 6 | Steals | 8 |
| 6 | Blocks | 5 |
