⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ IND better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 10 points worse than our numbers for the Pacers.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Pacers did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Pacers
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run cut a 18-point deficit to 9
Q4 6:47 · IND 90-99 MIL
Bad plays
- Technical
Bennedict Mathurin technical foul
Q2 2:29 · IND 37-51 MIL
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| IND | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Shooting from the field | 51% |
| 8 | Threes made | 10 |
| 26% | Three-point accuracy | 33% |
| 20 | Free throws made | 17 |
| 40 | Rebounds | 48 |
| 7 | Offensive rebounds | 7 |
| 20 | Assists | 20 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 52 |
| 11 | Fast break points | 9 |
| 13 | Points off turnovers | 11 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 7 | Steals | 6 |
| 3 | Blocks | 7 |
