⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 9 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ UTAH better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 9 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Jazz did not.
From the game
Ran them off the floor, 23 fast break points to 11
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 4-point lead to 13
Q1 7:54 · MIL 19-6 UTAH
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 2-point lead to 11
Q2 3:15 · MIL 51-40 UTAH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 14
Q4 1:53 · MIL 113-99 UTAH
Bad plays
- Technical
Ryan Rollins technical foul
Q2 5:32 · MIL 37-35 UTAH
Jazz
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run cut a 11-point deficit to 1
Q2 1:20 · MIL 51-50 UTAH
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run cut a 10-point deficit to 1
Q4 8:48 · MIL 91-90 UTAH
Bad plays
- Turnover
Kyle Filipowski bad pass turnover
Q4 3:49 · MIL 103-97 UTAH
📊The numbers
| MIL | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Shooting from the field | 34% |
| 15 | Threes made | 12 |
| 34% | Three-point accuracy | 24% |
| 16 | Free throws made | 25 |
| 48 | Rebounds | 53 |
| 7 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 33 | Assists | 23 |
| 42 | Points in the paint | 28 |
| 23 | Fast break points | 11 |
| 20 | Points off turnovers | 13 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 7 | Steals | 7 |
| 5 | Blocks | 3 |
