⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz fell 9 points behind the pace we expected in the third quarter and never got it back.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
-1Q129-23
-5Q228-28
-4Q328-24
-2Q425-26
▼ MEM better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 5 points worse than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Gave up second chances, eighteen offensive rebounds to their eleven
Key battles
11Blocks1
50%Three-point accuracy18%
29Assists18
11Offensive rebounds18
📊The numbers
| UTAH | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 40% |
| 3 | Threes made | 2 |
| 50% | Three-point accuracy | 18% |
| 35 | Free throws made | 31 |
| 52 | Rebounds | 50 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 18 |
| 29 | Assists | 18 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 14 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 6 | Steals | 7 |
| 11 | Blocks | 1 |
