⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
+4Q128-21
-3Q225-24
+4Q333-24
-4Q424-26
▼ SAC better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 4 points better than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
54%Three-point accuracy30%
7Threes made3
13Turnovers8
7Blocks4
📊The numbers
| UTAH | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 59% | Shooting from the field | 47% |
| 7 | Threes made | 3 |
| 54% | Three-point accuracy | 30% |
| 21 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 46 | Rebounds | 36 |
| 6 | Offensive rebounds | 9 |
| 31 | Assists | 23 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 11 | Points off turnovers | 9 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 4 | Steals | 4 |
| 7 | Blocks | 4 |
