⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
-5Q120-26
+1Q227-26
-2Q324-25
+3Q417-14
▼ SAC better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 5 points worse than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Could not get to the line, twelve free throws to their 22
Key battles
17Free throws made8
3Threes made7
3Blocks1
18Points off turnovers25
📊The numbers
| MEM | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 47% |
| 3 | Threes made | 7 |
| 27% | Three-point accuracy | 35% |
| 17 | Free throws made | 8 |
| 49 | Rebounds | 42 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 9 |
| 21 | Assists | 26 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 18 | Points off turnovers | 25 |
| 19 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 12 | Steals | 10 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
