⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
-4Q125-22
+11Q231-17
0Q321-19
-5Q421-22
▼ MEM better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 11 points better than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Gave up second chances, fourteen offensive rebounds to their six
Key battles
28Assists12
57%Three-point accuracy30%
6Offensive rebounds14
19Points off turnovers10
📊The numbers
| UTAH | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 53% | Shooting from the field | 36% |
| 4 | Threes made | 3 |
| 57% | Three-point accuracy | 30% |
| 26 | Free throws made | 23 |
| 45 | Rebounds | 43 |
| 6 | Offensive rebounds | 14 |
| 28 | Assists | 12 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 19 | Points off turnovers | 10 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 9 | Steals | 7 |
| 6 | Blocks | 6 |
