⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
-1Q126-30
-3Q225-30
+9Q334-25
-1Q421-24
▼ SAC better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 9 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
40%Three-point accuracy23%
6Steals11
6Threes made3
26Free throws made30
📊The numbers
| MEM | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Shooting from the field | 41% |
| 6 | Threes made | 3 |
| 40% | Three-point accuracy | 23% |
| 26 | Free throws made | 30 |
| 59 | Rebounds | 60 |
| 12 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 22 | Assists | 22 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 19 | Points off turnovers | 20 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 6 | Steals | 11 |
| 6 | Blocks | 5 |
