⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ MEM better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 9 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Owned the paint, 60 points inside to 40- Could not get to the line, twelve free throws to their 27
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Mike Budenholzer technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q1 5:02 · MIL 20-19 MEM
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 5 down to 5 up
Q1 6:47 · MIL 20-25 MEM
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Xavier Tillman flagrant foul type 1
Q3 3:41 · MIL 77-91 MEM
📊The numbers
| MIL | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Shooting from the field | 55% |
| 16 | Threes made | 15 |
| 34% | Three-point accuracy | 38% |
| 21 | Free throws made | 11 |
| 45 | Rebounds | 44 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 7 |
| 27 | Assists | 31 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 60 |
| 5 | Fast break points | 20 |
| 24 | Points off turnovers | 13 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 7 | Steals | 10 |
| 1 | Blocks | 3 |
