⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the fourth quarter. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ CHI better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 9 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Bulls did not.
From the game
Made eighteen threes to their eleven- Won the glass, 53 rebounds to 38
- A 15-0 run took them from 10 down to 5 up in the third quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 2 down to 8 up
Q1 8:46 · MIL 13-5 CHI
- 15-0 run
A 15-0 run took them from 10 down to 5 up
Q3 7:26 · MIL 66-61 CHI
Bad plays
- Technical
Joe Ingles technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 4:11 · MIL 69-63 CHI
Bulls
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 6 down to 3 up
Q3 4:11 · MIL 69-72 CHI
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MIL | CHI | |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Shooting from the field | 43% |
| 18 | Threes made | 11 |
| 39% | Three-point accuracy | 33% |
| 9 | Free throws made | 9 |
| 53 | Rebounds | 38 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 5 |
| 26 | Assists | 28 |
| 38 | Points in the paint | 40 |
| 9 | Fast break points | 9 |
| 18 | Points off turnovers | 16 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 7 | Steals | 10 |
| 3 | Blocks | 3 |
