⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks fell 11 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter but finished ahead of it.
Where it moved
▲ CHA better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 23 points worse than our numbers for the Hornets.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Hornets did not.
From the game
Made 22 threes to their six- A 17-0 run stretched a 16-point lead to 33 in the fourth quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Hornets
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 13
Q1 1:00 · CHA 41-28 MIL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Bucks
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run cut a 13-point deficit to 2
Q2 9:11 · CHA 41-39 MIL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 11-point lead to 20
Q4 6:39 · CHA 93-113 MIL
- 17-0 run
A 17-0 run stretched a 16-point lead to 33
Q4 4:03 · CHA 97-130 MIL
Bad plays
- Technical
Malik Beasley technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 0:00 · CHA 56-59 MIL
📊The numbers
| CHA | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Shooting from the field | 55% |
| 6 | Threes made | 22 |
| 23% | Three-point accuracy | 49% |
| 19 | Free throws made | 10 |
| 43 | Rebounds | 49 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 4 |
| 18 | Assists | 32 |
| 48 | Points in the paint | 42 |
| 13 | Fast break points | 16 |
| 12 | Points off turnovers | 9 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 5 | Steals | 4 |
| 2 | Blocks | 7 |
