⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 15 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ WSH better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 15 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Wizards did not.
From the game
Owned the paint, 60 points inside to 44- Lost the glass, 46 rebounds to 56
A 12-0 run cut a 19-point deficit to 7 in the third quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 2-point lead to 10
Q1 9:26 · MIL 14-4 WSH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 11-point lead to 19
Q1 4:50 · MIL 33-14 WSH
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 8-point lead to 17
Q4 8:30 · MIL 118-101 WSH
Bad plays
- Technical
Double technical foul - Gary Trent Jr. and Bub Carrington
Q2 0:38 · MIL 72-53 WSH
Wizards
Good plays
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run cut a 19-point deficit to 7
Q3 10:40 · MIL 72-65 WSH
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Bub Carrington flagrant foul type 1
Q4 4:13 · MIL 125-105 WSH
📊The numbers
| MIL | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 47% |
| 18 | Threes made | 17 |
| 41% | Three-point accuracy | 40% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 11 |
| 46 | Rebounds | 56 |
| 6 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 31 | Assists | 23 |
| 60 | Points in the paint | 44 |
| 22 | Fast break points | 18 |
| 1 | Points off turnovers | 17 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 8 | Steals | 5 |
| 6 | Blocks | 4 |
