⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies fell 10 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter but finished ahead of it.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 17 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, fourteen turnovers to their 22- Owned the paint, 54 points inside to 28
- A 12-0 run took them from 2 down to 10 up in the second quarter
- Gave up second chances, fifteen offensive rebounds to their seven
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run took them from 2 down to 10 up
Q2 6:54 · MEM 51-41 MIL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 15
Q3 9:13 · MEM 76-61 MIL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 2-point lead to 10
Q1 0:43 · MEM 25-35 MIL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MEM | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 43% |
| 13 | Threes made | 14 |
| 38% | Three-point accuracy | 36% |
| 26 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 42 | Rebounds | 48 |
| 7 | Offensive rebounds | 15 |
| 28 | Assists | 18 |
| 54 | Points in the paint | 28 |
| 26 | Fast break points | 13 |
| 15 | Points off turnovers | 20 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 22 |
| 12 | Steals | 11 |
| 9 | Blocks | 2 |
