⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
+5Q132-23
-21Q28-30
+6Q331-23
-6Q421-26
▼ UTAH better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 21 points worse than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Won the glass, 43 rebounds to 30- Made three threes to their ten
Key battles
10Threes made3
6Fast break points2
4Blocks1
22Free throws made13
📊The numbers
| SAC | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Shooting from the field | 54% |
| 10 | Threes made | 3 |
| 43% | Three-point accuracy | 60% |
| 22 | Free throws made | 13 |
| 42 | Rebounds | 53 |
| 8 | Offensive rebounds | 12 |
| 21 | Assists | 27 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 6 | Fast break points | 2 |
| 16 | Points off turnovers | 17 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 8 | Steals | 9 |
| 4 | Blocks | 1 |
