⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
0Q117-17
+5Q228-23
+1Q322-19
-9Q412-20
▼ CHI better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 9 points worse than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Bulls did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
0%Three-point accuracy19%
0Threes made3
3Blocks8
21Points off turnovers11
📊The numbers
| UTAH | CHI | |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Shooting from the field | 41% |
| 0 | Threes made | 3 |
| 0% | Three-point accuracy | 19% |
| 12 | Free throws made | 14 |
| 51 | Rebounds | 49 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 9 |
| 23 | Assists | 14 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 21 | Points off turnovers | 11 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 8 | Steals | 8 |
| 3 | Blocks | 8 |
