⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz fell 10 points behind the pace we expected in the third quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
-4Q123-30
+4Q219-15
+10Q335-25
-6Q418-25
▼ UTAH better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 10 points better than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, sixteen turnovers to their 26, and outscored them 38-20 off them- Lost the glass, 38 rebounds to 52
Key battles
20Points off turnovers38
7Steals14
26Turnovers16
21Offensive rebounds14
📊The numbers
| SAC | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Shooting from the field | 46% |
| 8 | Threes made | 6 |
| 47% | Three-point accuracy | 46% |
| 18 | Free throws made | 17 |
| 62 | Rebounds | 48 |
| 21 | Offensive rebounds | 14 |
| 21 | Assists | 29 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 20 | Points off turnovers | 38 |
| 26 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 7 | Steals | 14 |
| 5 | Blocks | 3 |
