⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings fell 17 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
+17Q135-18
-12Q212-24
-9Q319-29
-3Q420-21
▼ SAC better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 17 points better than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Jazz did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
3Blocks7
16Free throws made21
43%Three-point accuracy36%
22Assists18
📊The numbers
| UTAH | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Shooting from the field | 45% |
| 6 | Threes made | 5 |
| 43% | Three-point accuracy | 36% |
| 16 | Free throws made | 21 |
| 48 | Rebounds | 45 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 12 |
| 22 | Assists | 18 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 27 | Points off turnovers | 23 |
| 23 | Turnovers | 20 |
| 12 | Steals | 14 |
| 3 | Blocks | 7 |
